Oceanography Modeling

Dynamically Downscaled Regional Projections of
Ocean Acidification in the Main Hawaiian Islands

Ocean Acidification (OA) impacts in Hawai‘i are shaped by the islands’ unique physical and oceanographic context. The Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) are located within the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, a major ocean current system that shapes local water temperature, chemistry, and other characteristics.

Major Ocean Gyres of the Pacific
North Pacific Subtropical Gyre currents
Figure 1: Major current systems across the Pacific Ocean. The map highlights the interconnected gyres that drive large-scale circulation, situating the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre within a broader global context.

Source: Oceans of Data Institute – Ocean Tracks
Bathymetry and Current Dynamics in the Main Hawaiian Islands
Main Hawaiian Islands bathymetry
Figure 2: Ocean bathymetry in the MHI domain as represented in the ROMS/COBALT configuration. The red circle marks the location of the HOT Station ALOHA, 100 km north of O‘ahu. Orange arrows symbolically represent the main current systems in the domain: NHRC - North Hawaiian Ridge Current, HLC - Hawaii Lee Current, HLCC - Hawaii Lee Countercurrent, NEC - North Equatorial Current.


Source: Hošeková et al. (2025),
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

The region's steep bathymetry, with volcanic mountains rising from an abyssal plain over 6,000 meters deep to heights up to 4,000 meters above sea level, interacts with persistent northeasterly trade winds. This interaction disrupts currents, generating eddies and localized upwelling that drive biogeochemical dynamics.

Nearshore Coral Reef Habitats of the Main Hawaiian Islands
Fringing coral reefs around Hawai‘i
Figure 3: Distribution of fringing coral reefs around Oʻahu, with reef locations highlighted for the broader Main Hawaiian Islands.

Source: Allen Coral Atlas

These dynamic oceanographic conditions influence how OA impacts coral reefs, which mostly fringe the shallow (less than 5 km from shore) coastlines of the MHI, complicating predictions of reef vulnerability and resilience. Accurately characterizing these local conditions is essential for understanding and protecting Hawai'i's reefs as ocean chemistry and temperature shift with climate change.

Improved Spatial Resolution with Regional Modeling
Global vs downscaled OA projections
Figure 4: Comparison of sea surface temperature simulations for the MHI. The coarse-resolution CESM model (left) misses finer coastal detail, while the downscaled ROMS simulation (right) captures island landmasses and surrounding ocean features more accurately (Friedrich et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2023).

Global Climate Models (GCMs), like the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), lack the fine spatial resolution needed for robust local assessments in the MHI. We addressed this limitation by producing the first dynamically downscaled projections of OA for the region spanning 2000-2100 using a coupled Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) and Carbon, Ocean Biogeochemistry and Lower Trophics (COBALT) model nested within CESM2 outputs.

Three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) representing different emission pathways were analyzed:

  • SSP1-2.6: Strongly declining emissions (CO₂ peaks at 474 ppm in 2063, declining to 445 ppm by 2100)
  • SSP2-4.5: Slowly declining emissions (CO₂ reaching 603 ppm by 2100)
  • SSP3-7.0: Increasing emissions, baseline outcome of current trends (CO₂ reaching 871 ppm by 2100)

These SSPs represent plausible futures based on different assumptions about global climate policy, economic development, and population growth.

Emission Pathways in Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)
CO₂ trajectories for SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0
Figure 5: Projected global CO₂ concentrations for three SSP scenarios, illustrating contrasting futures of mitigation (SSP1-2.6), stabilization (SSP2-4.5), and high emissions (SSP3-7.0).
Source: After O’Neill et al., 2016 © DKRZ
Projected Declines in Ocean Acidification Indices
Trends in aragonite saturation, pH, and SIR
Figure 6: Mean nearshore (land-adjacent grid cells) upper 30 m aragonite saturation state (a), pH (b) and substrate-to-inhibitor ratio (in mol(HCO3)/µmol(H+), c) for the main Hawaiian Islands projected for the SSP3-7.0, SSP2-4.5 and SSP1-2.6 scenarios. The shaded areas represent the range of values across individual grid cells at that time. The SSP3-7.0 line corresponds to the mean of three ensemble members, and the range represents the minimum and maximum value of nearshore grid cells of the ensemble mean.


Source: Hošeková et al. (2025),
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Our projections track three key indices that measure OA's impact on coral calcification: aragonite saturation state (Ωₐ), pH, and substrate-to-inhibitor ratio (SIR, [HCO₃⁻]/[H⁺]). Under SSP3-7.0, all OA indices decline rapidly and continuously throughout the century. SSP2-4.5 exhibits intermediate trends, with values stabilizing mid-century. Under SSP1-2.6, the decline is slower and may stabilize or slightly reverse after 2060. These projected decreases in Ωₐ, pH and SIR indicate increasing OA and suggest that coral reefs may face greater difficulty maintaining calcification rates, with the extent and timing of these shifts determined by future emissions trajectories.

We also introduced a climate novelty metric to determine when future ocean conditions might move outside the range that coral reefs have experienced in recent history, providing a framework for contextualizing ecological risk. This metric quantifies how much projected values of OA indices, Ωₐ, pH, and SIR, depart from the natural variability observed during a reference period (2005–2020), expressed as the ratio of the anomaly to historical variability. For example, a novelty value of 2 indicates that the anomaly is twice the reference variability, suggesting conditions substantially different from recent historical experience. This approach allows us to identify when and where coral reefs may encounter unprecedented chemical conditions that could exceed their adaptive capacity.

Climate Novelty in Ocean Conditions
Schematic of novelty metric
Figure 7: Example of a climate novelty metric showing departures from historical variability, with thresholds (2σ, 4σ) indicating when future ocean chemistry moves beyond past experience.
Projected Novelty in Ocean Acidification Indices Across Emission Scenarios
Ωₐ & SIR novelty trends
Figure 8: Mean nearshore (land-adjacent grid cells) upper 30 m ΩA (a) and substrate-to-inhibitor ratio (in mol(HCO3)/µmol(H+), b) novelty for the main Hawaiian Islands projected under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0 scenarios. The shaded areas represent the range of values across individual grid cells at that time. The SSP3-7.0 line corresponds to the mean of three ensemble members, and the range represents the minimum and maximum novelty of the ensemble mean.


Source: Hošeková et al. (2025),
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Results show that, under all scenarios, Ωₐ will eventually surpass historical variability ranges, with the magnitude and timing of change strongly dependent on future CO₂ emissions. Under SSP3-7.0, mean Ωₐ novelty reaches approximately 12 times the reference variability by 2100, while SIR novelty reaches 9 times reference levels. In contrast, SSP1-2.6 shows much lower impacts, with Ωₐ novelty peaking at 3 times reference variability mid-century before declining to around 1 by century's end. For SIR, novelty values remain low in SSP1-2.6, peaking at about 3 before gradually returning near present-day levels, while SSP2-4.5 plateaus at intermediate values of around 6 for Ωₐ and 4 for SIR by 2100. These results indicate that, even under the lowest emission scenario, some departure from historical conditions is unavoidable, but the extent of change and potential risk to coral reef adaptation are much greater under higher emissions. The shaded regions in the figure reflect the range across nearshore locations, highlighting spatial variability in projected outcomes.

The spatial distribution of novelty was also analyzed, revealing that both the timing and intensity of exposure to novel conditions vary by location, with windward (northeast-facing) coastlines generally showing higher novelty values. The spatial patterns differ between OA indices: for Ωₐ, novelty tends to increase from south to north, while for SIR, the highest values are found along eastern coastlines. Leeward (southwest) areas, which experience higher baseline variability, generally show lower novelty. These patterns highlight pronounced differences in potential ecological risk across the islands and emphasize the importance of local conditions in shaping future OA impacts.

Spatial Patterns of Novelty in Nearshore Waters
Maps of spatial novelty patterns
Figure 9: Mean ensemble novelty of ΩA (a,c) and substrate-to-inhibitor ratio (b,d) for nearshore grid cells in SSP3-7.0, averaged between 2050–2055 (a,b) and 2095–2100 (c,d). Note that separate color scales are used for each variable and time period to preserve the spatial patterns, given the narrow differences in novelty value ranges. These spatial patterns highlight areas of elevated novelty resulting from the contrasting responses of ΩA and substrate-to-inhibitor ratio to dissolved inorganic carbon and temperature, as discussed in the text.


Source: Hošeková et al. (2025),
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

By the end of the century, nearly all reef areas are projected to experience ocean conditions outside the range observed in recent history. The high-resolution, scenario-based projections from this analysis characterize the local chemical and physical environments that shape coral reef exposure, providing the environmental inputs necessary for evaluating ecosystem responses under changing conditions.

Resources

Hošeková, L., Friedrich, T., Powell, B. S., & Sabine, C. (2025). Patterns of ocean acidification emergence in the Hawaiian Islands using dynamically downscaled projections. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 130, e2024JC021903. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021903

QR code to paper
Scientific Paper

Scan or view online

QR code to code repository
Code Repository

Scan or view on Dataverse

Presentation Slides

View slides (PDF)